XM69 Hacker vs Ares 90 C
Both XM69 Hacker and Ares 90 C are tier 11 medium tanks in World of Tanks. Below is a head-to-head stat comparison across HP, armor, gun performance, mobility, and concealment.
Save up to 40% on premium currency, game time, and bundles via verified key marketplaces.
Compare WoT gold prices →Side-by-side stats
| Stat | XM69 Hacker USA | Ares 90 C USA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| HP | 1680 | 1640 | Hacker |
| Hull armor | 127 | 120.7 | Hacker |
| Damage | — | — | Tie |
| Penetration | — | — | Tie |
| DPM | — | — | Tie |
| Speed | 48 | 55 | Ares 90 C |
| Camo (still) | 21.5% | 28.3% | Ares 90 C |
What the numbers say
The XM69 Hacker has 40 more HP than the Ares 90 C. Hull armor differs by 6.299999999999997mm at the front (Hacker is thicker). 0 Top speed differs by 7 km/h (Ares 90 C is faster).
XM69 Hacker is a premium tank. Find current discounts via the official shop or verified resellers.
See XM69 Hacker in the WG shop →orFind on Kinguin →FAQ
Which is better in WoT, XM69 Hacker or Ares 90 C?
By raw stats alone, the two tanks are evenly matched. Actual matchup performance depends on map, role, and player skill — but on paper this is the breakdown.
Are Hacker and Ares 90 C the same tier?
Yes, both are tier 11 medium tanks.
What about other tier 11 medium tanks?
See the full tier 11 medium tank tier list for all options at this tier.